
Abstract Algebra Abstract Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
August 16th, 2017, 03:59 AM  #11 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2017 From: United Kingdom Posts: 211 Thanks: 64 Math Focus: Algebraic Number Theory, Arithmetic Geometry  
August 16th, 2017, 04:33 AM  #12 
Math Team Joined: Jul 2013 From: काठमाडौं, नेपाल Posts: 878 Thanks: 60 Math Focus: सामान्य गणित 
I said so because there were only two sets in his example.

August 16th, 2017, 05:31 AM  #13 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2017 From: United Kingdom Posts: 211 Thanks: 64 Math Focus: Algebraic Number Theory, Arithmetic Geometry  Ah, then perhaps you should have said "o (A) = number of elements in A that are not in B" rather than "o (A) = number of elements that belong to only A (should not belong to other sets)". They are very different statements!

August 16th, 2017, 06:19 AM  #14 
Math Team Joined: Jul 2013 From: काठमाडौं, नेपाल Posts: 878 Thanks: 60 Math Focus: सामान्य गणित  

Tags 
cardinality, proof, sets, union 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
doubt about union of two complementary sets  beesee  Math  5  November 2nd, 2014 11:15 AM 
Proving these union sets with induction?  dekker11  Applied Math  0  February 27th, 2012 04:05 PM 
Sets under union  L094129  Applied Math  1  August 27th, 2011 01:01 PM 
Union Of Sets  gettingit4  Real Analysis  14  January 30th, 2011 11:07 AM 
Union Of Sets  gettingit4  Number Theory  1  December 31st, 1969 04:00 PM 