
Abstract Algebra Abstract Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
August 13th, 2017, 05:48 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Aug 2017 From: mathmatistan Posts: 5 Thanks: 0  several truth\false from set theory
Apparently, I've solved the wrong set of exercises and now I have to solve a different bunch (lol). the questions are true/false types. I'll write what I did/tried or got wrong for every question: 1) for every equivalence relation over A={1,2,3,4,5,6} there is a class in which the number of variables is odd. Even though the number of variables is not odd, there could be an odd class with odd number of variables. but I don't know whether it's suffice to assert it's a true claim. 2) for every equivalence relation over A={1,2,3,4,5,6,7} there is a class in which the number of variables is odd. Seems true, since the number of variables inside A is odd. 3) if R is symmetrical and reflexive over A={1,2} then R is equivalence relation. To be called an equivalence relation, it should hold: reflexive relation, transitive relation and and symmetric relation. in this case, I think it's a true claim. 4) if R is symmetrical and reflexive over A={1,2,3} then R is equivalence relation. I think that in this case, it is not not a true claim because of the odd number of variables. 5) if $\displaystyle R^2$ is symmetrical and reflexive over A={1,2,3}, then R is equivalence relation. R^2 is defined as R x R, but I still don't know whether it's a true claim or not. I think that not. if I'm wrong, please show me why. 6) if S is equivalence relation, then every one of its classes has the same number of variables. Logically, it seems to be true. I don't see a reason why this sentence would be wrong. 7) there exist even number $\displaystyle m,n \in Z$ so that $\displaystyle (n,m) \in S$ Seems to be true. Again, I don't see any reason why it would be false or example that would contradict it. 8) for every $\displaystyle n \in Z$, $\displaystyle (n1,n)\in S^2$ Since we're talking about $\displaystyle S^2$, then negative numbers become positive, and thus it seems logical that this sentence will be true. I've tried to give detailed reasoning for my questions so you could understand why I chose a certain answer. Please correct me if I'm wrong and help me improve and become better. Last edited by skipjack; August 13th, 2017 at 07:11 AM. 
August 13th, 2017, 07:23 AM  #2  
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 141 Thanks: 59  Quote:
In (1) can you not see any way to subdivide A into disjoint classes such that all are even? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
 
August 13th, 2017, 10:14 AM  #3 
Newbie Joined: Aug 2017 From: mathmatistan Posts: 5 Thanks: 0 
Sorry for not providing the full information regarding questions 6,7,8: S is a relation on the integer set(Z) that applies $\displaystyle (n,m) \in Z \text{ iff } m^2+m=n^2+n$ Last edited by skipjack; August 13th, 2017 at 10:24 AM. 
August 14th, 2017, 11:54 AM  #4  
Newbie Joined: Aug 2017 From: Paris (France) Posts: 2 Thanks: 0 Math Focus: Probability, stochastic processes 
Hi, Did you manage to solve from (1) to (6) with the advice Micrm@ss gave you? Quote:
Quote:
 
August 27th, 2017, 04:25 AM  #5 
Math Team Joined: Jan 2015 From: Alabama Posts: 2,647 Thanks: 680 
An obvious counterexample for (1) is the relation in which every member of A is related to all others. The only equivalence classes are A itself and the empty set. They contain an even number of elements.


Tags 
set, theory, truthfalse 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
several true\false questions in set theory  mathsnoob  Calculus  2  August 13th, 2017 03:13 AM 
truth table, how to build a truth table with these informations  Gab  New Users  4  February 4th, 2017 11:16 AM 
True or False Linear Algebra Theory Question  jacksonjabbers  Linear Algebra  1  October 30th, 2016 03:44 PM 
Kalphauer Theory Groundbreaking Theory? Yes or No? Need Help Completing Theory.  flextera  New Users  0  July 30th, 2014 12:12 PM 
The Truth  Meetra  Applied Math  2  October 28th, 2009 07:56 AM 