
Abstract Algebra Abstract Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
April 29th, 2017, 05:02 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Apr 2017 From: Europe Posts: 15 Thanks: 1  One theorem for rings
Let $\displaystyle R$ be finite, commutative ring with $\displaystyle 1=/=0$. Statements below are equivalent: a) $\displaystyle a \in U(R)$, where $\displaystyle U(R)$ is a set of invertible elements of $\displaystyle R$ b) $\displaystyle a$ is not a zero divisor c) $\displaystyle a^m=1$, where $\displaystyle m$ is the number of elements that are not zero divisors in $\displaystyle R$ My task is to discuss this theorem in terms of assumptions that are made. To be more precisive  I need to tell which of them are essential for the theorem to work and why + which ones can be omitted and then yet at the same time theorem will work the same way. In this case I also have to give reasons. I came up with one idea. Assumption about $\displaystyle 1=/=0$ is not necessary, because if $\displaystyle 1=0$, then we deal with zero ring, which is finite and commutative, and all statements mentioned in theorem actually happen, because $\displaystyle 0$ is invertible, $\displaystyle 0$ is not a zero divisor, futhermore  $\displaystyle 0^0=1$, but we need to remember that $\displaystyle 1=0$. I also think that assumption about being finite can be loosened up, but I have no really satisfying explanation for that. I have no thoughts on commutative property, but something tells me it's the one that is the most essential in this. I haven't seen using this property in a proof, so I can't really tell. Any ideas? 

Tags 
rings, theorem 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Rings  ewilfredo91  Abstract Algebra  5  September 28th, 2014 01:02 PM 
Rings. Z4[x]  math interest22  Abstract Algebra  5  February 5th, 2014 07:30 AM 
Rings  alejandrofigueroa  Abstract Algebra  1  November 17th, 2013 06:26 PM 
Rings?  remeday86  Abstract Algebra  4  June 28th, 2010 07:55 PM 
Rings  bjh5138  Abstract Algebra  0  December 4th, 2007 04:22 PM 