
Abstract Algebra Abstract Algebra Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
January 9th, 2013, 08:36 AM  #1 
Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 100 Thanks: 0  Show two groups are nonisomorphic.
I'm trying to show that there are at least three nonisomorphic groups of order , where . I think I've got it if the following claim is true, so if anyone could help me figure out if this is true or not (I think it is), and how to show it is, that would be great! Claim: The two groups with presentations and are nonisomorphic. Thank you! Edit: Assume is a prime. Also, the original problem was to find at least three nonisomorphic *nonabelian* groups with the above characteristics. Otherwise, of course there are two nonisomorphic abelian groups of order 4p, and it's not hard to find one nonabelian group using semidirect products. The key here is to use semidirect products and distinct homomorphisms into from a group of order 4 to find at least three nonabelian groups. I did this, and I'm just down to these two presentations, which if are different, I will have a total of three nonabelian nonisomorphic groups of this order. 
January 9th, 2013, 10:34 AM  #2  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 385 Thanks: 3  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic. Quote:
 
January 9th, 2013, 12:53 PM  #3  
Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 100 Thanks: 0  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic. Quote:
I also seem to have forgotten that I was looking for at least three nonisomorphic *nonabelian* groups of order 4p, where p is prime and equivalent to 1 mod 4.  
January 9th, 2013, 10:56 PM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2012 Posts: 184 Thanks: 17  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic.
something isn't quite right, here. for example, let p = 5. then your first group is: <x,y: x^4 = 1, x^5 = 1, xyx^1 = y> which is abelian. it seems like you're trying to give a "presentation" version of semidirect products, but: for this to work, we need a homomorphism: <x>>Aut(<y>). now, <x> has order 4, and Aut(<y>) has order p1, so we want conjugation by x to yield an automorphism of order 2 or 4 (an automorphism of order one is the identity, which gives a direct product, which would be abelian). but the automorphism y>xyx^1 = y^[(p1)/4] doesn't work. perhaps you think p = 5 is "too special". let's look at p = 13. consider y>xyx^1 = y^3 (3 = (131)/4). if we do this twice, we get: y>y^3>y^9 (this is the same as saying: x^2yx^2 = y^9). so what's the big deal? ok, we do it a third time: y>y^3>y^9>y^27 = y. this is the same as saying: x^3yx^3 = y. still aren't seeing the problem? ok, one more time: y>y^3>y^9>y>y^3. this is the same as saying x^4yx^4 = y^3. but...x^4 = 1, right? so y = 1y1 = x^4yx^4 = y^3. but if y = y^3, then y^2 = 1, in which case y^13 = 1 CAN'T be true. so your presentations are illdefined. now, it IS true that Aut(<y>) is isomorphic to Aut(Zp), which is isomorphic to Z(p1). but this isomorphism is "tangled", the automorphisms of Zp are: a>ka, where k is in Zp* (or, if you prefer, u>u^k, in multiplicative notation). but we don't get the multiplicative group Zp* by deleting {0} and changing + to *. for example, for p = 5: 0 in Z4 induces the identity map a>a (a>1a) this is a nobrainer. 1 in Z4 induces the map a>2a (this automorphism is of order 4) 2 in Z4 induces the map a>4a (this automorphism is of order 2, since 4(4a) = 16a = a). 3 in Z4 induces the map a>3a (another automorphism of order 4: a>3a>4a>2a>a) so you don't want the presentation: <x,y: x^4 = y^p = 1, xyx^1 = y^[(p1)/4]> but rather: <x,y: x^4 = y^p = 1, xyx^1 = y^?[(p1)/4]> where ? is the isomorphism between (Z(p1),+) and (Zp*,*). it's going to be hard to give an explicit formula for ?. 
January 10th, 2013, 07:40 PM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2012 Posts: 184 Thanks: 17  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic.
i think this is the result you need: let H ,N be finite groups with gcd(H,N) = 1 with N abelian and let ?1,?2:H> Aut(N) be two distinct homomorphisms, neither of them trivial. then the two semidirect products N x H obtained are nonisomorphic if ker(?1) is not isomorphic to ker(?2). for suppose we have an isomorphism ?:G1 = (N x H)1>(N x H)2 = G2. consider the mapping G1>G1/(Nx{e}). if g is an element of G1 not in Nx{e}, then g divides H. thus g does not divide N. thus if g is in a subgroup of order N, it must lie in Nx{e}, so that Nx{e} is the only subgroup of G1 of order N, and likewise for G2. thus ?(Nx{e}) = Nx{e}. this in turn means they have isomorphic centralizers (in G1 and G2, respectively). now Gi = (Nx{e})({e}xH) = U{(Nx{e})(e,h) : h in H}, and since N is abelian, so is Nx{e}, so Nx{e} is contained in C(Nx{e}). this means that C(Nx{e}) is also a union of cosets of Nx{e}, consisting of cosets: (Nx{e})(e,h) where (e,h) is in C(Nx{e}). so C(Nx{e}) = (Nx{e})({e}xH?C(Nx{e}) (this looks better if we just write C(N) = N(H?C(N))). i claim that ker(?i) = {h in H such that (e,h) is in ({e}xH?C(Nx{e})}. for if h is in ker(?i), then h induces the identity automorphism of N, whence for all n in N: (e,h)(n,e) = (e?i(h)(n),he) = (en,he) = (n,h) = (n?i(e)(e),eh) = (n,e)(e,h), so (e,h) is in the centralizer of Nx{e}. on the other hand, if (n,e)(e,h) = (e,h)(n,e) for all n in N: we have (n,h) = (?i(h)(n),h), so that ?i(h)(n) = n, for all n in N, hence ?i(h) is the identity automorphism. this means that C(Nx{e}) = (Nx{e})({e}x(ker(?i)) (or, what looks better: C(N) = N(ker(?i))). thus ker(?1) ? C(Nx{e})/(Nx{e}) ? ?(C(Nx{e})/?(Nx{e}) = ?(C(Nx{e})/(Nx{e}) ? ker(?2). now, in your particular problem we have H = 4, N = p, so gcd(H,N) = 1, and N = <y>, which is cyclic, thus abelian. if x is a generator for H, and ?1(x) is the (unique!) automorphism of <y> with order 2, we see that ker(?1) = {e,x^2}. if x is a generator for H and ?2(x) is (any) automorphism of <y> with order 4 (there are 2 of these), we see that ker(?2) = {e}. **************** what are these automorphisms? well it's hard to state them in terms of <y> (that is, Zp), without a discrete log table, but we can explicitly give them in terms of Z(p1) (which is isomorphic to Aut(Zp)). that is, we pick the element of Aut(Zp) corresponding to (p1)/2 (the unique element of order 2 in Z(p1) under addition) for an automorphism of order 2, and we pick the element corresponding to (p1)/4 or 3(p1)/4 for an automorphism of order 4. 
January 12th, 2013, 06:20 AM  #6  
Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 100 Thanks: 0  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic. Quote:
 
January 12th, 2013, 10:13 AM  #7 
Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 100 Thanks: 0  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic.
Quick question: is G1/(Nx{e}) isomorphic to H?

January 12th, 2013, 10:18 AM  #8  
Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 100 Thanks: 0  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic. Quote:
EDIT: Never mind.. I forgot ? was our isomorphism.. of course this is true. Also, why does this mean they have isomorphic centralizers? Edit: Again, this is clear, never mind! I should have stopped to think for a minute :P Is there possibly a source for this result that you could direct me to as well? Thanks for all the help!!  
January 12th, 2013, 06:03 PM  #9  
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2012 Posts: 184 Thanks: 17  Re: Show two groups are nonisomorphic. Quote:
G = HN, with H?N = {e}, and by the second isomorphism theroem: HN/N ? H/(H?N) = H/{e} = H, so yes. as far as a reference goes, i'm not sure where you might find this, but it's probably somewhere in Dummit and Foote, and you might find it (on the web) at http://crazyproject.wordpress.com/. let me see if i can rephrase this "at a higher level". a semidirect product of H over N, is made from a homomorphism ?:H>Aut(N). in the "internal" semidirect product, this is actually an action of H on N by conjugation. such an action, for a given h in H, is trivial if and only if h commutes with all of N: hnh^1 = n <=> hn = nh, in other words iff h is in the centralizer of N. since N is normal in G = HN, it's certainly normal in C(N)...provided N is a subgroup of C(N) (which is why we need N to be abelian). this means that C(N)/N = (H?C(N))N/N ? (H?C(N))/[(H?C(N))?N], by the second isomorphism theorem. (the tricky part here is to see that C(N) = (H?C(N))N. in general if we have the group AB, for a normal subgroup B of G, and a subgroup A of G, and any subgroup B < K < AB, then: K = (A?K)B. note we can write k in K as k = ab, for a in A, b in B. hence a = kb^1, and since B < K, a is in K, that is k is in (A?K)B. on the other hand, if we have an element ab in (A?K)B, then a is in K, and b is in K, so ab is in K). but what is (H?C(N))?N? since any element of H?C(N) is in H, and H?N = {e}, the subgroup (H?C(N))?N must be trivial: (H?C(N))?N = (H?N)?(C(N)?N) = {e}?N = {e}. that is: C(N)/N ? H?C(N). by the above, this means ker(?) ? C(N)/N. that is: the kernel of ? when we look at an "external" semidirect product, is just H?C(N) when we consider an "internal" direct product (when...N is abelian, otherwise N will not BE a subgroup of C(N)). note that our isomorphism ? is really an isomorphism from G to G with "two different multiplications that agree on N". so where the two semidirect products differ is: "how h conjugates n" (in this case, which other generator of <y> y gets sent to upon conjugation by x). so, say (the automorphism) y>xyx^1 is of order 2. this means: x^2yx^2 = y <this is group 1. on the other hand, if (the automorphism) x>xyx^1 is of order 4, x^2yx^2 = y^1 (this is the unique automorphism of <y> of order 2) <this will be group 2. now let's see what this might mean in terms of an isomorphism ? (i will use prime to denote the elements of im(?)): ?(y) must be an element of <y'> (<y'> is the sole sylow psubgroup of <x',y'>, since if kp + 1 divides 4, then k = 0, since p ? 5). this means that ?(x^2yx^2) = ?(y) = y'^k <"k" is just an annoyance here, it really doesn't contribute to the proof. now ?(x) = (x'^a)(y'^b), and clearly a is nonzero. furthermore, note that: [(x^a)(y^b)]y'[(x'^a)(y'^b)]^1 = (x'^a)[(y'^b)y'(y'^b)](x'^a) = (x'^a)y'(x'^a), so the conjugate of y' by ?(x) is the same as the conjugate of y' by x'^a. now suppose a is odd. then conjugating by ?(x^2) is the same as conjugating by ?(x) twice, which gives the same result as conjugating by x'^2, which yields y'^k, when applies to y'^k. but ?(x^2)?(y)?(x^2)^1 = ?(x^2yx^2) = ?(y) = y'^k, and since y' is odd (prime, in fact, but whatever), we never have y'^k = y'^k, for any k in {1,2,...,p1} (<y'> has no elements of order 2). so we must have ?(x) = x'^2y'^b. but then ?(x^2) = (?(x))^2 = (x'^2)(y'^b)(x'^2)(y'^b) <using the fact that x'^4 = e, so x'^2 = x'^2. and in im(?), (x'^2)(y'^b)(x'^2) = [(x'^2)y'(x'^2)]^b = (y'^1)^b = y'^b, so: ?(x^2) = (x'^2)(y'^b)(x'^2)(y'^b) = (y'^b)(y'^b) = e, contradicting the fact that ? is an isomorphism. so the two groups are not, in fact, isomorphic.  

Tags 
groups, nonisomorphic, show 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Show that group Z2 x Z2 is not isomorphic to the group Z4  Vasily  Abstract Algebra  6  June 5th, 2012 02:58 PM 
About minimal normal groups and subnormal groups  Sheila496  Abstract Algebra  0  October 20th, 2011 09:45 AM 
Isomorphic Groups..U(8) and Z4  jcrot30  Abstract Algebra  5  March 31st, 2011 08:51 AM 
Show these two rings are isomorphic  pantherattack  Abstract Algebra  2  October 29th, 2009 01:14 PM 
cosets, groups, isomorphic... 3 different problems  Jamers328  Abstract Algebra  17  November 19th, 2008 02:18 PM 